Legal Opinion

Beal v. Board of Selectmen

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 21, 1995PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the entry of summary judgment for the defendant, the board of selectmen of Hingham (board). We transferred the appeal to this court on our own motion, and now affirm.

The following are the relevant facts viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See Alioto v. Marnell, 402 Mass. 36, 37 (1988). In 1986, the board appointed the plaintiff to the position of police officer. On July 26, 1988, the plaintiff was injured in a head-on collision while on duty. Following the accident, an ambulance transported the plaintiff to South Shore Hospital where she was treated…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Labonte v. Hutchins & WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Dartt v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Wynn & Wynn, P.C. v. Massachusetts Commission against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Cargill, Inc. v. Beaver Coal & Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Godfrey v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API