Aisbett v. Paradise Mountain Mining & Milling Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an ' order of the Superior court of Los Angeles County denying a motion for a change of place of trial. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion made by defendants for a change of the place of trial from the county of Los Angeles to the county of San Bernardino.
The action (one other than those described in sections 392, 393, and 394 of the Code of Civil Procedure) is brought by stockholders of the Paradise Mountain Mining and Milling Company, a corporation, against said corporation and members of its board of directors, joined therewith as defendants, to have declared null and void certain proceedings wherein an assessment was levied upon the corporate stock of the corporation, and to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McKenzie v. BarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hearne v. De YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Remington Sewing Machine Co. v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Quint v. DimondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Pieper v. Centinela Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Monogram Co. v. KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Sequoia Pine Mills, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Carruth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- La Mirada Cmty. Hosp. v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Dillman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.