Legal Opinion
Werner v. Satterlee, Stephens, Burke & Burke
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 28, 1992No. 89 Civ. 5130 (CSH)PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
This federal securities action arises out of the failure of the Matthews & Wright Group, Inc. (“M & W”), an underwriter of tax exempt housing bonds, and plaintiffs’ attempts to recover money invested in M & W.
Several related actions have been brought in this District, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (“S.E.C.”) investigation of M & W. See S.E.C. v. Matthews & Wright Group, Inc., No. 89 Civ. 2877 (RJW).
This case is before the Court on several motions. Defendant Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke (“Satterlee Stephens”) has moved…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- In Re Olsten Corp. Securities Litig.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Kaplan v. GelfondDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. LaBranche & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Trief v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- In re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.