Legal Opinion

Trief v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 22, 1992No. 89 Civ. 1741 (DNE)PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*195OPINION & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

Plaintiffs have brought this suit pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Rules”) on behalf of a class consisting of all persons who purchased Dun & Bradstreet Corporation common stock between October 2, 1986 and November 15, 1989 (the “Class Period”). Plaintiffs assert that defendants Dun & Bradstreet Corporation (“D & B”), Charles W. Moritz and Robert B. Weissman violated Sections 20(a) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”), Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5, and committed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. CE Design Ltd. v. King Architectural Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Damassia v. Duane Reade, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. Marisol A. by Next Friend Forbes v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API