Legal Opinion
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. LaBranche & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 27, 2004No. Case Nos. 03 Civ. 8521, 03 Civ. 8935, 03 Civ. 9968 and 04 Civ.2038; No. 03 Civ.8264 RWSPublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The above-captioned cases are actions for securities fraud brought on behalf of a purported class of investors1 who claim to have sustained losses as a result of a fraudulent scheme perpetrated by Defendants, specialist firms on the New York Stock Exchange (“Specialist Defendants”)2 and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) itself (collectively, “Defendants”), in violation of, inter alia, Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as well as Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. For the reasons set forth below, each of the…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- John E. Johnson and H/w Ann Marie Johnson v. The Celotex Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- In Re: Cendant Corporation LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Savino v. Computer Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Kaplan v. GelfondDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In re eSpeed, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Foley v. Transocean Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Sallustro v. CannaVest Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Khunt v. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.