Legal Opinion

Rainey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1921No. 5926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Van Zandt County of having in his possession intoxicating liquor, not for mechanical, scientific, medicinal or sacramental purposes, in violation of what is termed the Dean Act, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

There are fourteen bills of exception in this record, the contentions in which will be noticed without mention of the formal objections made.

A motion to quash the. indictment for its failure to use the expression “had in his possession” the liquor in question, was properly overruled as it appears…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte GilmoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rambo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Rambo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Carpenter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. State v. RandSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 1925
  5. Whitmire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API