State v. Rand
Superior Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtHahn, J.
Heard on defendants’ motion to quash the indictment.
The indictment charges that the defendants “unlawfully and fraudulently did combine, confederate, conspire and agree together by divers unlawful means, unlawfully and designedly to secrete and hide in their control and possession certain large quantities of intoxicating liquors containing more than one-half of one per centum of ethelic alcohol by volume, fit for beverage purposes,” etc.
Defendants moved to quash the indictment on several grounds, chiefly “because there is no crime known to the law as secreting and hiding intoxicating liquors…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rainey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Elkhorn Mining Corp. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- United States v. EversonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1922