Rambo v. State

Prom a conviction in the district court of Burnet county for selling intoxicating liquor, appellant brings tliis appeal.

The facts are amply sufficient* to support the conclusion of the jury, and will not be further discussed.

By his first bill of exceptions, appellant complains of the overruling of his motion to quash the indictment, based on the proposition that to charge a sale of liquor “capable of producing intoxication” does not charge a violation of the law. This question has been decided adversely to appellant’s contention. Tucker v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 251 S. W. 1090.

Complaint is…