Legal Opinion
McLaughlin v. City of Syracuse
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 27, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.
The Special Term denied a motion by the defendant City of Syracuse, under section 193 (subd. 2) of the Civil Practice Act, to be permitted to bring in as additional parties defendant the owners of certain premises located in the city and who the city claims are or will be liable over to the defendant city for the claim made by the plaintiff against the city. From such order the defendant city appeals here. The parties who are the owners of the building in question and whom the city desires to bring in as parties defendant are Antonio Grosso and Rosaría Grosso. Their premises were adjacent to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fox v. Western New York Motor Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Trustees of the Village of Canandaigua v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Scott v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Municipal Service Real Estate Co. v. D. B. & M. Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Khoury v. County of SaratogaNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lane v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1950
- Behar v. SavardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958