Lane v. Celanese Corp. of America
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BRENNAN, Chief Judge.
Motions are made herein to vacate an order permitting the service of third-party complaints, and to dismiss such complaints because of legal insufficiency.
The pleadings in these actions are substantially identical. The issues are similar as are the motions which are separately made in each case, and will be disposed of together. For convenience the plaintiffs will be hereinafter referred to as “plaintiff”, the defendant and third-party plaintiff as “Celanese”, and the third-party defendant as “Precision”.
On October 18, 1949, two employees of Precision while in the course…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Thompson-Starrett Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Jones v. Waterman SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Blaszak v. Union Tank Car Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- Burke v. Sky Climber, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Olch v. Pacific Press & Shear Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- State Highway Commission v. BourneWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
- Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. the SS BeatriceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.