State v. Grier
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
Defendant’s fourth assignment of error, and the main focus of her appeal, is that the trial judge committed reversible error by not directing a verdict for defendant at the close of the evidence. The defendant argues that the evidence presented shows that agent Arnold’s activities constituted entrapment as a matter of law and that Arnold induced her into criminal action at a time when she was in no way predisposed to criminality.
The defense of entrapment requires proof of two essential elements:(1) acts of persuasion, trickery or fraud carried out by law enforcement officers or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. DayeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. JamersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. PeviaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. GinnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.