Legal Opinion

Butler Brothers Co. v. Levin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 5, 1926No. 25,144PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action to foreclose a mortgage wherein judgment went for defendants. Plaintiff appeals. The mortgage was on the homestead of Max and Mary Levin. Not having been signed by the wife, it was void under section 8340, G. S. 1923, which provides that if the owner of the homestead be married, no mortgage thereon except for the unpaid purchase money, “shall be valid without the signatures of both husband and wife.” The invalidity of the mortgage is sought to be avoided by subjecting the wife to an estoppel arising from her promise to plaintiff, as the creditor not of the wife but of the husband and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Sleeth v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Baker v. BakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Irvine v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Osman v. WistedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hatlestad v. Mutual Trust Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Kingery v. KingerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Thom v. ThomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. Stephenson (In Re MJK Clearing, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
  5. Renville State Bank v. Lentz, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API