Legal Opinion
Thom v. Thom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 1, 1940No. 32,575PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
This is an action for the partition of a 160-acre farm near Rushmore in Nobles county.
The defendant “Estate of Albina D. Thom” was joined as the holder of a mortgage on which there was due $6,000. The parties stipulated that the premises were subject to the mortgage for the amount stated.
One William C. Thom was the common source of title. On September 1, 1926, he and his wife conveyed the land by warranty deed to his brothers, Arthur G. Thom, the plaintiff, and Frank V. Thom, subject to a -mortgage for $7,000 in favor of his father, which his mother then owned under the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Fried v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Butler Brothers Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Ellis v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Barchent v. SelleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
3Cited by12 opinions
- Peoples National Bank v. Linebarger Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Bustad v. BustadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Albachten v. BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- JP Koch, Inc. v. JC Penney Company, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
- Kelly v. GramSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.