Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Interpretation of S.D. Const. Art. V, §§ 2 and 6

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2011No. 26089PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADVISORY OPINION

TO HIS EXCELLENCY, DENNIS DAU-GAARD, THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

[¶ 1.] Pursuant to South Dakota Constitution article V, § 5 you have requested an advisory opinion from the Supreme Court on two important questions of law dealing with the eligibility requirements for individuals seeking appointment to the South Dakota Supreme Court. You ask:

1. What actions or intent are sufficient to satisfy the requirement of Article V, §§ 2 and 6 that justices of the Supreme Court be voting residents within the district from which they are appointed?

2. At what point in time,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. South Dakota Automobile Club, Inc. v. VolkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Fetters Ex Rel. Fetters v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. City of Sioux Falls v. Sioux Falls Firefighters, Local 814South Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re Opinion of the Supreme Court Relative to the Constitutionality of Chapter 239, Session Laws of 1977South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Interpretation of South Dakota Constitution and State Law Re: State Legislator's Interest in State or County ContractsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  2. In the Matter of the Interpretation of S.D. Const. and State Law Re: Eligibility for Crf Grant ProgramsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API