Legal Opinion

City of Sioux Falls v. Sioux Falls Firefighters, Local 814

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1975No. File 11406, 11411 and 11424PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLER, Justice.

The plaintiff city brought this action for a declaratory judgment seeking to have SDCL 9-14A, as enacted by Ch. 70, S.L. 1971, providing for binding arbitration of labor disputes of certain municipal firemen and policemen, declared unconstitutional in its entirety. From the trial court’s judgment that SDCL 9-14A-18, which makes binding the board’s determination, was unconstitutional but sustaining the remainder of that chapter the plaintiff has appealed. Defendants have cross appealed from the judgment to the extent that SDCL 9-14A-18 was declared unconstitutional. We affirm in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  2. City of Warwick v. Warwick Regular Firemen's Ass'n.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  3. Erie Firefighters L. No. 293 v. GardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Schryver v. SchirmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State ex rel. McGee v. GardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. County of Riverside v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. City of Detroit v. Detroit Police Officers Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Greeley Police Union v. City Council of GreeleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API