Legal Opinion
Berg v. Groschen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 14, 1989No. C6-88-1722PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment dismissing as untimely claims arising under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (1981) and the due process clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. We reverse.
FACTS
Appellant Robert Berg is a former state employee. On December 21, 1984, he appeared before respondent, Board of Directors of the Minnesota State Retirement System, seeking reversal of a prior Board decision terminating Berg's right to receive disability benefits. At the hearing, Berg explained the reasons why he felt he should be reinstated and answered questions of the Board.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cook v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jane Marie Egerdahl v. Hibbing Community College Minnesota Community College System State of Minnesota Myron Schmidt Anthony Kuznik and Jerry KrauseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Helleloid v. Independent School District No. 361District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Vaughn v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Jane Marie Egerdahl v. Hibbing Com. CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.