Legal Opinion

Jane Marie Egerdahl v. Hibbing Com. College

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 18, 1995No. 95-1700PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Jane Marie Egerdahl claims that the State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Community College System, Hibbing Community College (“Hibbing”), and three Hibbing employees discriminated against her on the basis of race and gender and, therefore, violated Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (“Title IX”), 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d (“Title VI”), and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The District Court dismissed Egerdahl’s suit. We reverse the District…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jane Marie Egerdahl v. Hibbing Community College Minnesota Community College System State of Minnesota Myron Schmidt Anthony Kuznik and Jerry KrauseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 513, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 835 Mary Ann Carlo v. City of Chino, and Officer Hector GuerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Harper v. Southeast Arkansas Education Service CooperativeDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API