Legal Opinion
Wertish v. Salvhus
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 21, 1997No. C6-96-955PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Daniel Andrew Salvhus for farther review of the decision of the court of appeals filed November 5, 1996 be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of clarifying that Minn.Stat. § 65B.51, subd. 1 requires that economic loss benefits offset any tort recovery to avoid the possibility of double recovery. Richards v. Milwaukee Insurance Co., 518 N.W.2d 26 (Minn.1994), rehearing denied (Minn, Aug. 18,1994). While the general provisions of Minn.Stat. § 548.36 suggest the filing of a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Richards v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lee v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Braginsky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Russell v. Haji-AliCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Silva v. Maplewood Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Silva v. Maplewood Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998