Legal Opinion

Braginsky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 11, 2001No. C3-00-1096PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

This appeal raises the question of whether the noneconomic-damage thresholds in the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 65B.41-.71 (2000), apply to an uninsured-motorist action arising from an accident between an insured automobile driver and a negligent, uninsured motorcycle driver. Because we conclude that the thresholds do not apply, we reverse. We affirm the district court’s denial of a collateral-source offset, although on a different ground.

FACTS

Appellant Alexander J. Braginsky sought recovery from his uninsured-motorist (UM) insurer,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. McIntosh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Hanson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Feick Ex Rel. Feick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Coughlin v. LaBountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lee v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API