Braginsky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
This appeal raises the question of whether the noneconomic-damage thresholds in the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 65B.41-.71 (2000), apply to an uninsured-motorist action arising from an accident between an insured automobile driver and a negligent, uninsured motorcycle driver. Because we conclude that the thresholds do not apply, we reverse. We affirm the district court’s denial of a collateral-source offset, although on a different ground.
FACTS
Appellant Alexander J. Braginsky sought recovery from his uninsured-motorist (UM) insurer,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- McIntosh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Hanson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Feick Ex Rel. Feick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Coughlin v. LaBountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lee v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002