Russell v. Haji-Ali
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODENBERG, Judge.
In this personal-injury appeal, appellant-defendant argues that the district court erred in determining that underinsured-motorist (UIM) benefits paid to respondent-plaintiff prior to trial in the direct action do not constitute a collateral source that reduces the award of damages under Minn.Stat. § 548.251. We hold in this case of first impression that, under the plain language of the collateral-source statute, and in accordance with the supreme court’s decision in Imlay v. City of Lake Crystal, 453 N.W.2d 326, 331 (Minn.1990), UIM benefits received before the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Employers Mutual Companies v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.