Legal Opinion

Russell v. Haji-Ali

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 14, 2013No. A12-1213Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RODENBERG, Judge.

In this personal-injury appeal, appellant-defendant argues that the district court erred in determining that underinsured-motorist (UIM) benefits paid to respondent-plaintiff prior to trial in the direct action do not constitute a collateral source that reduces the award of damages under Minn.Stat. § 548.251. We hold in this case of first impression that, under the plain language of the collateral-source statute, and in accordance with the supreme court’s decision in Imlay v. City of Lake Crystal, 453 N.W.2d 326, 331 (Minn.1990), UIM benefits received before the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Employers Mutual Companies v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API