Legal Opinion
Roy v. Danis
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 31, 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
The plaintiff Gerard A. Roy appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (York County, McKinley, J.) entered on a directed verdict granted to the defendants, Carle E. Danis and Arundel Auto Service, Inc., in an action by Roy seeking damages from the defendants for their breach of a contract with Roy. Our review of the record discloses that the trial court properly found that as a matter of law there was no contract between the parties, and we affirm the judgment.
In February of 1986, Roy filed the instant suit against the defendants seeking damages for the alleged breach of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zamore v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Packard v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Sevigny v. Home Builders Ass'n of Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Pendleton v. SardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Boetsch v. Rockland JayceesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Forrest Associates v. Passamaquoddy TribeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- VanVoorhees v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- MacHias Savings Bank v. RamsdellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Smile, Inc. v. Moosehead Sanitary DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Jim Mitchell and Jed Davis, PA v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.