Legal Opinion

Boetsch v. Rockland Jaycees

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 8, 1972PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

On appeal. Plaintiff, by his complaint, alleged that he suffered injuries resulting from the negligent manner in which the defendant conducted a “snowmobile” race open to the admission paying public. At the close of plaintiff’s case, the Justice below granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, pursuant to M.R.C.P., Rule 50(a).

The sole issue before us on appeal is the correctness of this ruling. We conclude that the Justice was in error.

The test to be applied in determining whether a directed verdict is proper has been repeated in a long line of Maine cases.

“No…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Hawkins v. Maine & New Hampshire Theaters Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  3. Kuemmel v. VradenburgCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Orr v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  5. Virginia State Fair Ass'n v. BurtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Portland Valve, Inc. v. Rockwood Systems Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Zamore v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. Packard v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. Baker v. Mid Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. Reed v. AC McLoon & CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API