Legal Opinion

MacHias Savings Bank v. Ramsdell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 4, 1997PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Yvonne Ramsdell and Sonja Rams-dell appeal from the summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Washington County, Marsano, J.) in favor of the Machias Savings Bank on its complaint against the Ramsdells 1 seeking the foreclosure of mortgages. Yvonne contends the court abused its discretion by its ruling on her motion to amend her answer to the Bank’s complaint and erroneously applied the doctrine of res judicata to bar her affirmative defense that the Bank violated the provisions of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1691-1691f (1982 &…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Beegan v. SchmidtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Ramsdell v. Erskine BowlesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. NotisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Van Houten v. Harco Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. McAlister v. Slosberg (In Re Slosberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1998
  2. MacOmber v. MacQuinn-TweedieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  3. Johnson v. Samson Constr. Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  4. Keybank National Ass'n v. SargentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. Bank of the West v. KlineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API