Honeywell International, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING INFRINGEMENT OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 6,467,914
BRADEN, Judge.
For the reasons discussed below, the court has determined that Plaintiffs established by a preponderance of the evidence, a prima facie case as to literal infringement of Claim 2 of the United States Patent No. 6,467,914 and, alternatively, infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. Plaintiffs, however, have failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence either literal infringement or infringement under the doctrine of equivalents as to either Claim 1 or Claim 3 of the relevant…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Paone v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Honeywell International Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Honeywell International Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Honeywell International Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.