Legal Opinion
Honeywell International Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 14, 2008No. 02-1909CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ INVENTION SECRECY ACT CLAIMS.
SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge.
This is a case of first impression regarding the requirements of standing under the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951, 35 U.S.C. §§ 181-88 (“Invention Secrecy Act”).1
*2251. RELEVANT FACTS.2
On October 10, 1985, Richard L. Cohen filed a Form PTO-426, Serial No. 06/786,269 (“the '269 Application”), but assigned the invention described therein “concerning night vision goggles compatible with full col- or display” to Allied Corporation.3 See DMX 36 at DE-1038; see also id. at DE-1039-56.4 Prosecution commenced.
Pursu…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Johnson & Johnston Associates Inc. v. R.E. Service Co., Inc. And Mark FraterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Application of Virgil W. Vogel and Paul W. VogelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Farrand Optical Co., Inc. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- James Campion v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Honeywell International Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010