Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Shortly after respondent was injured he applied to the Industrial Commission for compensation, and the. proceedings under this application were conducted without notice to the attorney general of the existence of the claim. The commission awarded compensation on January 19, 1934. On July 13, 1934, the commission set aside its former award as invalid on the theory that sufficient and proper notice of the claim had not been given the state. Thereafter, and upon due notice to all parties, the matter was re-examined. Upon the hearing the commission found as matters of fact:

“That the day of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Barragar v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chapman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. McKinney v. DorlacNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Wineland v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Vollmer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API