Legal Opinion

Wineland v. Taylor

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1938No. 6550PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGiyens, J.

Appellant, living at Ashton, was employed as a mechanic in the Rexburg garage of respondent Taylor Chevrolet Company, owned and operated by D. G. Taylor, which operates two garages, one at Ashton and one at Rex-burg.

Saturday, August 14, 1937, Taylor and Peterson, his manager of the service department at both garages, decided to send appellant to Ashton to ultimately replace one Jackson as foreman there, that he should go there immediately and report for duty to one Hemming, manager of respondent’s garage at that place.

Desiring, however, that appellant should acquaint himself before he left…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Zeier v. Boise Transfer Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Murdoch v. Humes SwanstromIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Matter of Schwimmer v. Kammerman KaminskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Munson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Combined Insurance Co. of America v. SinclairWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Manion Ex Rel. Manion v. WaybrightIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. McKinney v. DorlacNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Gingell v. Walters Contracting CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Ridgway v. Combined Insurance Companies of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API