Legal Opinion

In re R.P.M.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 16, 2005No. COA04-1135PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

To render a person guilty of a crime by aiding and abetting, the State must present "some evidence tending to show that he, . . . by his conduct made it known to [the] perpetrator that he was standing by to lend assistance when and if it should become necessary." State v. Keeter, 42 N.C.App. 642, 644-45, 257 S.E.2d 480, 482 (1979). In this case, Juvenile contends that the evidence presented was insufficient to support his convictions of common law robbery and assault with a deadly weapon with intent to inflict serious injury based on an aiding and abetting theory. Because the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re S.R.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. In re M.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. In Matter of KhCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. In Re JcCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API