In re R.P.M.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
To render a person guilty of a crime by aiding and abetting, the State must present "some evidence tending to show that he, . . . by his conduct made it known to [the] perpetrator that he was standing by to lend assistance when and if it should become necessary." State v. Keeter, 42 N.C.App. 642, 644-45, 257 S.E.2d 480, 482 (1979). In this case, Juvenile contends that the evidence presented was insufficient to support his convictions of common law robbery and assault with a deadly weapon with intent to inflict serious injury based on an aiding and abetting theory. Because the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re S.R.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- In re M.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- In Matter of KhCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- In Re JcCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.