Legal Opinion

State v. Billinger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 21, 1970No. 7012SC522PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

In his first assignment of error defendant contends that the in-court identification of him given by the witness Long was tainted by an illegal out-of-court viewing of the defendant by the witness, therefore, was inadmissible. Suffice to say we have carefully considered this contention and the authorities cited by defendant in support thereof but conclude that it is without merit. The assignment of error is overruled.

In his second assignment of error defendant challenges the correctness of the following instruction of the trial judge to the jury:

“I am allowing the defendant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. State v. . WyontSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DrummondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. NaborsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  5. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API