Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Morton v. Hauser

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjchwalter, J.

There are three cases by this title, original actions in mandamus, brought in this court to compel George Hauser, commissioner of buildings of the city of Cincinnati, to issue permits for the erection of certain billboards. They were heard together on agreed statements, of facts, as they involve the interpretation and validity of certain sections of what are known as the billboard ordinances of the city of Cincinnati. The sections of the ordinances in question are the following:

Section 345-E, Building Code:

“Any billboard, signboard or other structure or any substantial part thereof now…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. St. Louis Poster Advertising Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  2. Liggett's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Yoselowitz v. Peoples Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Stahl v. StahlSuperior Court of Guam · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API