Legal Opinion

Casco Products Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 5, 1939No. 15337PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLY, District Judge.

In this action plaintiff charges defendant with infringing patents No. 1,376,154, Morris; No. 1,620,548 Hammond; No. 1,657,-189, Bain; No. 1,763,343 Cohen; and No. 1,944,925, Cohen. None of these patents is covered by the license agreement mentioned in case No. 15336. In none of the patents, with the possible exception of Morris No. 1376,154, is invention disclosed. There appears nothing more in these patents than the result of patient experiment by persons skilled in the art desiring to produce a more efficient or commercially valuable article. Altoona Publix Theatres…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Ruben Condenser Co. v. Aerovox CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. Fink v. V. Foscato, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  4. Vulcan Corp. v. Slipper City Wood Heel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  5. Richardson Co. v. Hood Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winslow v. National Electric Products Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Bowles v. John F. Casey Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Bowles v. Deep Vein Connellsville Coke Co., Brier HillDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API