Vulcan Corp. v. Slipper City Wood Heel Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
Appeal from a decree adjudging claims 9 to 14, inclusive, of Kinney patent No. 1,790,925, issued February 3, 1931, valid and infringed. The patent relates to a grooving machine for forming the breast grooves in Cuban wood heels for women’s shoes.1
The technical terms used in the industry are adequately defined in United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. Day Wood Heel Co., 46 F. (2d) 897 (C.C.A.6). It is sufficient to state that the object of the invention in suit was to cut the breast surface of the wood heel so that it would be both longitudinally convex and transversely concave,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Lees-Bradner Co. v. National Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
3Cited by7 opinions
- Universal Electric Co. v. A. O. Smith CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Simmons v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Hamilton Standard Propeller Co. v. Fay-Egan Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Standard Cap & Seal Corp. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Casco Products Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.