Legal Opinion

Richardson Co. v. Hood Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 19, 1927No. 2150PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court for Massachusetts dismissing the bill in equity in the suit brought on the United States letters patent No. 1,156,122, issued to James C. Woodley, October 12,1915, for improvement-in fibrous compositions and processes of manufacture. The plaintiffs, joint owners of the patent, allege that the defendant infringes on process claims 3, 11, 12, 13, and 15, and product claims 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, and 23.

In his specifications the patentee says:

“The invention has for its object the obtaining of a composition of matter having…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Electrical Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Imperial Bottle Cap & Machine Co. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1905
  3. Berlin Mills Co. v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. National Safety Lift Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Callison v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. Casco Products Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1939
  3. Callison v. BoyleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  4. Woodley v. American Container Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API