Legal Opinion

State v. Ayon-Urbano

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2026No. S072084PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

376 June 4, 2026 No. 29 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Adverse Party, v. DAVID AYON-URBANO, Defendant-Relator. DAVID AYON-URBANO, Plaintiff-Relator, v. META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant-Adverse Party. (CC 24CR31979; 24CN05648) (SC S072084) Original proceeding in mandamus.* Argued and submitted May 5, 2026. Rian Peck, Visible Law LLC, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for relator. Also on the briefs were Zachary J. Stern, Zachary J. Stern PC, Salem, and Ginger G. Mooney, Ginger G. Mooney LC, Hood River. Leigh A. Salmon, Assistant Attorney…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lindell v. KaluginOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Gwin v. LynnOregon Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Ayon-UrbanoOregon Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API