Legal Opinion
Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. State, Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 18, 1995No. UP-51-91; CA A81631PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
The Federation of Oregon Parole and Probation Officers (FOPPO) seeks review of an Employment Relations Board (ERB) order. The order determines that the state did not commit an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain with FOPPO regarding the impacts of an intergovernmental agreement to transfer certain corrections officers from state employment to employment by Multnomah County. We reverse and remand.
This is the second time this case has been before us. In Federation of Oregon Parole v. Dept. of Corrections, 119 Or App 355, 357-58, 850 P2d 1154 (1993) (FOPPO 7), we described the operative…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wasco County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local No. 2752Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Salem Police Employees Union v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Gish v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. State, Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. State, Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 1995