Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. State, Department of Corrections
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
The issue in. this case is whether the State of Oregon, acting through the Department of Corrections, (ODOC) committed an unfair labor practice when it declined to bargain with the Federation of Oregon Parole and Probation Officers (FOPPO) over the terms and conditions of the “intergovernmental agreement” that resulted when Multnomah County (county) decided to transfer certain correctional officers from employment with ODOC to employment with the county. The Employment Relations Board (ERB) held that ODOC had not committed an unfair labor practice. The Court of Appeals reversed. Federation of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Salem Police Employees Union v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Washington County Police Officers Ass'n v. Washington CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. State, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995