Legal Opinion
Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 21, 1993No. UP-51-91; CA A75823PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
Federation of Oregon Parole and Probation Officers (FOPPO) seeks review of an order of the Employment Relations Board (ERB). The order found that respondents had not committed an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain over the decision or the impact of the decision to transfer a group of probation and parole officers from employment with the State of Oregon to employment with Multnomah County pursuant to ORS 423.550.
Before 1991, Multnomah County provided only mis-demeanant parole and probation supervision; felony parole and probation supervision was provided by the state. Accordingly,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Sutherlin Education Ass'n v. Sutherlin School District No. 130Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Salem Police Employees Union v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. State, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. State, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. State, Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 1995