Public Service Commission for the State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, Atlantic Richfield Co., Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
These petitions for review challenge the validity of the Federal Power Commission’s order, establishing “just and reasonable rates,” under Sections 4 and 5 of the Natural Gas Act, for sales of natural gas in interstate commerce from the Texas Gulf Coast producing area. The court remands the order to the Commission for further consideration.
The order is composed of two basic parts. The first is the schedule of base area rates. With respect to this, .Chief Judge Bazelon files an opinion for the court, beginning at page 1087 infra. District Judge CHARLES R. RICHEY concurs in this opinion.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Open America v. The Watergate Special Prosecution ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Shell Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, and Consolidated Cases. In Re National Rate Cases for New GasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Public Service Commission v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Oesby v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.