Legal Opinion
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. MILLER and STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KIMBROUGH
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 20, 2015No. SCBD 6104, 6105PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
' WINCHESTER, J.
{1 The complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association, brought separate Rule 6 disciplinary proceedings against the respondents, Stephanie Bradley Miller and Pamela Jean Kim-brough. 1 The OBA alleged violations of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct, including Rules 3.3, 2 3.4, 3 3.8(d), 4 4.1, 5 and 8.4(c)-(d), 6 as well as Rule 1.3 7 of the RGDP. The crux of the allegations is that the two respondents while prosecuting a murder trial failed to disclose to the defense inconsistent information taken during an interview of an eyewitness. Essentially, the Bar Association is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GasawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- In Re Attorney CSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. MILLER and STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KIMBROUGHSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015