Legal Opinion

Gardner v. City of Reidsville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1967No. 767PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Appellees contend that appellant cannot challenge the procedures of the Reidsville election since appellant failed to comply with Rule 19(3) of the Rules of the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. at p. 554. The following is appellant’s assignment of error:

“Plaintiff assigns as error the Court’s signing of the Final Judgment which contained erroneous findings of fact and erroneous conclusions of law; and further assigns as error the Court’s failure to hold that Chapter 650 violates the terms of Article II, Section 29, of the North Carolina Constitution; and its further failure to hold that even under the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Carolina-Virginia Coastal Highway v. Coastal Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Baker v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Sykes v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. City of Asheville v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. In Re Appeal of RamseurCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Smith v. County of MecklenburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API