Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2004No. 02S03-0310-PC-463PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Justice.

The question presented is whether an illegal sentence imposed pursuant to a plea agreement automatically renders the entire agreement void. We conclude it does not.

Facts and Procedural History

In 1988, the State charged Phillip Lee with robbery as a Class C felony and also alleged that he was an habitual offender. Under the terms of a written plea agreement Lee pleaded guilty to the robbery charge in exchange for the State's dismissal of the habitual offender allegation. Also under the terms of the agreement, the trial court sentenced Lee to a term of eight years imprisonment,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Shaun BaldacchinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  4. Larry Joe Carnine, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Mills v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Mary Rodgers-Rouzier v. American Queen Steamboat Operating Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  5. Fry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API