Legal Opinion
Larry Joe Carnine, Sr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 10, 1992No. 91-1978PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
The government and Larry Camine, Sr. entered into a guilty plea agreement that appears to be missing a part: the start date of his sentence. Contending that his plea is constitutionally defective, Camine brought an action to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court denied the motion, dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction as to any claim concerning the computation of Carnine’s term and finding the substance of his challenge to be without merit. Were Carnine’s claim in fact a call for recalculating his sentence, the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jones v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Marcus Allan McIntosh v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- James J. Valona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Frank E. ReadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Gerald W. Clemente v. Troy AllenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.