Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2007No. 48S04-0702-PC-72PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoehm, J.

We hold that appellate counsel is ineffective if counsel fails to provide the trial record establishing facts that support a valid claim raised in the appeal but unsupported by the record provided.

Factual and Procedural Background

On October 9, 1999 at approximately 11 or 11:30 pm, Robert “Kwan” Harris, age 32, and his friend James Common were outside their Anderson, Indiana apartment when they met two girls, “A” and “B,” who were walking home from a mall. Harris and Common invited the girls to talk with them, and the girls walked over to the two men. The girls told Harris and Common that they…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Timberlake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Juan Manzano v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Baer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Deshazier v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Major Wilson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. A.S. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API