Legal Opinion

Loughridge v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided March 25, 2002No. CIV 98-B-1302, 98-B-1884, 98-B-2118, 99-B-227, 99-B-345, 99-B-488, 00-B-388PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, Chief Judge.

In this diversity action Plaintiffs bring suit in seven consolidated cases under Colorado state law against Defendants Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (“Goodyear”) and Chiles Power Supply d/b/a Heatway Radiant Floors and Snowmelting (“Heatway”). Heatway moves for an in limine ruling regarding the applicability of a fro rata Lability defense to four claims. The motion is adequately briefed and oral argument would not materially aid its resolution. For the following reasons, I grant the motion.

The facts of this ease are fully set out in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. International Insurance v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Vaughan v. McMinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. Slack v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Scoggins v. Unigard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. JCW Electronics, Inc. v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Toothman v. Freeborn & PetersColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Carter v. BRIGHTON FORD, INC.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. In re Becker v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.AColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. United States v. K.P. Kauffman Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API