Legal Opinion
Carter v. BRIGHTON FORD, INC.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 2010No. 09CA1966PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge GRAHAM.
Plaintiff, Chad Carter, who purchased a high performance automobile which proved defective, appeals the summary judgment dismissing his claims against defendant, Brighton Ford, Inc., for breach of implied warranty of merchantability and revocation of acceptance. We reverse and remand.
I. Background
In April 2007, Carter purchased from Brighton Ford a 2006 Mustang produced pursuant to a joint manufacturing agreement between Ford Motor Company and Saleen Inc. The Mustang contained numerous high performance components which were manufactured or installed by Saleen. The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- In re FCA US LLC Monostable Elec. Gearshift Litig.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Bylsma v. R.C.WilleyHumanTouchUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Barnhart v. American Furniture Warehouse Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Bennington v. Stryker CorporationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.