Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. National Apartment Leasing Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 10, 1987No. 185 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

National Apartment Leasing Company (NALCO) has filed preliminary objections to the Commonwealths amended civil action in equity1 filed in our original jurisdiction. We will overrule the objections.

*302In NALCO I we set forth in some detail the gravamen of the Commonwealths action. Suffice it to say that the Attorney General in the name of the Commonwealth, pursuant to the authority he claims to have under the provisions of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (Law), Act of December 17, 1968, P.L. 1224, as amended, 73 P.S. §§201-1—201-9.2, seeks to impose…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. BonadioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. National Apartment Leasing Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. FLICKCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Foster v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Wallace v. PastoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Chatham Racquet Club v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. White v. Moses Taylor HospitalDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Com. of Pa. v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API