Legal Opinion
Foster v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 21, 1991No. 3483 C.D. 1986(A)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRUMLISH, Jr., Senior Judge.
OPINION
Before us are the preliminary objections of Peat Marwick Main & Company (Peat Marwick) to the complaint filed against it by Constance Foster, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth, in her capacity as the rehabilitator of the Mutual Fire, Marine and Inland Insurance Company (Mutual Fire). We overrule these preliminary objections.
Since this Court’s order of December 4,1986, Mutual Fire (now determined to be insolvent) has been placed in statutory rehabilitation under Section 515 of Article V of the Act of May 17, 1921, P.L. 789, as amended, added by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Caplin v. Marine Midland Grace Trust Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Jacobson v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Cianfrani v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Corcoran v. Frank B. Hall & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Koken v. SteinbergCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Unified Sportsmen v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Morin v. BrassingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Warren v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.