Legal Opinion
White v. Moses Taylor Hospital
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 9, 1991No. Civ. 89-1588PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEALON, District Judge.
The Hill-Burton Act, 42 U.S.C. § 291 et seq., (hereinafter Hill-Burton or the Act), requires medical facilities that are recipients of its funds to assure a reasonable amount of uncompensated services, determined by a formula based on a percentage of operating costs or of federal assistance provided, to patients who are deemed unable to pay according to prescribed income guidelines. 1 In this action, plaintiff seeks generally to enforce the “assurances” of uncompensated services made by Moses Taylor Hospital (hereinafter Hospital) under the Act and, in…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Waye v. First Citizen's National BankDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Eds Adjusters, Inc. v. Computer Sciences Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1991
- Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Ridlen v. Four County Counseling CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.