Langerman v. Puritan Dining Room Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. William H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
As the alleged assignee of The Anglo-Californian Bank, the plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a mortgage, “alleged to have been executed by the defendants, W. R. Goodbody and Emily E. Goodbody, to secure the payment of two certain promissory notes, one for the sum of five thousand dollars, and the other for three thousand nine hundred dollars, executed by the defendant, Puritan Dining Room Company, to said bank. ’ ’ The dining room company and the other defendants, other than the Goodbodys, failed to answer the complaint and judgment by default was thereupon entered against them. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shirras & Others v. Caig & MitchelSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Michigan Insurance v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- London & San Francisco Bank v. BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- McKinster v. . BabcockNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- McDaniels v. ColvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1844
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Wong v. Beneficial Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Lomanto v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Gates v. Crocker-Anglo Nat'l BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- MacHado v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.