Legal Opinion

MacHado v. Bank of Italy

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1924No. Civ. No. 4537PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Appellant instituted this action against the Bank of Italy, a corporation, for the purpose of requiring it and others to state and set forth their rights and interests in and to certain lands described in the complaint, whether acquired through deed of trust, liens or otherwise. The relief asked for was that the court determine the amount due, together with the cost of reconveyance, and upon payment or deposit in court of such sum the title of plaintiff be quieted. General relief, was also asked for. Defendants, answering, set up the defense that they claimed certain rights and interests in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Sivers v. SiversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Brittan v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Savings Bank v. AsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. W. P. Fuller & Co. v. McClureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fergus County v. OsweilerMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Lumber & Builders Supply Co. v. RitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. In re KellyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
  4. Willard v. National Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. California Funding Corp. v. Long Beach National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API